— —
Follow on X
LESSONS

The security budget and fees

Miners are paid by subsidy plus fees. As the subsidy shrinks, security must come from fees. Whether they will suffice is Bitcoin's most serious open question.

6 MIN READ
Miner revenue is fees plus a shrinking subsidy.
LEVEL · Intermediate
IN THIS LESSON · 6 OF 6
BY THE END YOU WILL BE ABLE TO ANSWER
  • What replaces the subsidy as it declines?
  • Why does a smaller BTC subsidy not necessarily mean less security?
  • When does the block subsidy reach zero?
  • After the April 2024 halving the subsidy is 3.125 BTC. What will it be after the next halving, in BTC?

Then prove it: a 3-question quiz · a challenge. The lesson marks itself complete at 100%.

After this lesson you can: explain where miner income comes from as the subsidy shrinks.

The cost of attacking Bitcoin depends on how much hash power protects it, and hash power follows miner revenue. That revenue, the security budget, is the block subsidy plus transaction fees.

The question

The subsidy halves every four years and reaches zero around 2140. Long before that it becomes small relative to the value of the network. If fees do not grow to replace it, hash power could fall relative to the value protected, making attacks cheaper. This is not FUD; it is a real design question that serious bitcoiners discuss.

Stacked view: block subsidy shrinking by epoch while fees must grow to keep miner revenue up; illustrative.
The shape of the question: the subsidy halves on schedule; fees must do the rest. Illustrative, not a forecast.

The optimistic case

  • Fees are a market for block space. As bitcoin's value and use grow, so does what people will pay for final settlement.
  • Layers like Lightning bundle many payments into few on-chain transactions, each of which still pays, and high-value settlement is insensitive to fee.
  • Fiat-denominated security matters: a smaller BTC subsidy at a much higher price can fund more hardware than today's.
  • Historically, every halving has been followed by hash rate highs, not collapse.

The cautious case

Two columns: the optimistic and the cautious reading of the fee question.
Both cases, honestly.

  • Fees have been a minority of miner revenue for most of Bitcoin's history, with brief spikes.
  • A fee-only regime could make miner income volatile and encourage reorganisations to steal fee-rich blocks.
  • If fees must be high, cheap on-chain use for ordinary people ends, pushing them to layers with their own trust assumptions.

What to watch

The fee share of miner revenue, hash price, and the block-space demand created by layers and new uses. All are on the Bitcoin Charts dashboard. Proposals to add a small permanent subsidy ("tail emission") exist and are rejected by most of the community as a breach of the cap. The next few halvings will tell us more than any argument.

Course checklist: what you can now do

Tick each one you have actually done. The course is finished when they are all ticked, not when the quiz is.

MINI CHALLENGESubsidy now

After the April 2024 halving the subsidy is 3.125 BTC. What will it be after the next halving, in BTC?

BTC
CHECK YOURSELF
1/3 What replaces the subsidy as it declines?
2/3 Why does a smaller BTC subsidy not necessarily mean less security?
3/3 When does the block subsidy reach zero?
pick an answer for each question

SOURCES

  1. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (Satoshi Nakamoto, 2008)
Progress is saved in this browser only.