After this lesson you can: explain why forked coins are not bitcoin.
A hard fork copies the ledger: everyone who held bitcoin at the fork block held the new coin too. That made forks a tempting marketing device in 2017 and 2018. Dozens were announced. A few mattered briefly.
Bitcoin Cash (August 2017)
The big-block chain from the Blocksize War: 8 MB blocks, later 32 MB, no SegWit. Backed by large miners and a few prominent figures. It never approached bitcoin's hash rate, developer base or liquidity, and has traded at a small fraction of bitcoin's price since.
Bitcoin SV (November 2018)
A split from Bitcoin Cash led by Craig Wright, who claimed to be Satoshi (a claim UK courts rejected in 2024), with gigabyte-scale blocks. Delisted from major exchanges after its leadership's conduct; marginal today.
Bitcoin Gold, Diamond, Private and the rest
Mostly attempts to capture attention and the free coins. Several suffered 51% attacks because their hash rate was tiny. Most are effectively dead.
What the forks demonstrate
- Forking the code is easy; forking the network is not. Users, miners, exchanges, developers and liquidity stayed with the chain that kept the rules.
- Forks do not inflate bitcoin. The new coins are not bitcoin; the 21 million cap is untouched.
- Replay protection and other technical details matter when claiming forked coins; many people lost privacy or funds doing so carelessly.
- The economic majority chooses the name. Whichever chain the market values is "bitcoin", and so far it has always been the one that changed least.
Look up Bitcoin Cash's price as a percentage of bitcoin's today. Enter it.